Blackpool prevails in rollercoaster appeal
The local council has had its decision to reject plans for a log flume and 77-metre tall fairground ride upheld by the Planning Inspectorate.
Blackpool Council had refused to give Blackpool Pier Company planning permission or a lawful development certificate for the two rides last year due to their scale.
At 77 metres, the Skyflyer would be 12 metres taller than the Big One at Blackpool Pleasure Beach.
“As such, the Starflyer ride would alter, blur and disrupt that definition of the resort boundary,” according to planning inspector Paul Freer.
Freer added that the scheme would “unacceptably harm the character and appearance of the area” and impinge on people’s ability to “appreciate the engineering structure of the pier when viewed from the east”.
The applicant had wanted to install the log flume and Skyflyer on the Promenade close to South Pier, which it owns. The firm said income from the rides would be reinvested into the pier, and Central Pier, which are in need of repairs.
Blackpool Pier Company said the council’s decision to reject the plans was inconsistent given that the authority has since granted permission for its own scheme – the installation of an Upside Down House attraction – nearby.
Freer agreed, saying: “I take the appellant’s point insofar as there does also appear to be an element of inconsistency of approach here in terms of individual factors. However, there is consistency in terms of the broad approach to the overall balance.”
To learn more about the project and to read the decision notice in full, search for reference numbers 25/0790 and 25/0269 on Blackpool Council’s planning portal.


And this is exactly why landscape character is so important when assessing the impact of development—whether it’s housing, data centres or solar farms. The landscape should help dictate where development is appropriate, rather than development dictating what happens to the landscape
By Lee Graham
I wonder if Blackpool Tower would ever have got planning permission if proposed today
By Anonymous
A log flume and a sky flyer are not rollercoasters
By Anonymous
“unacceptably harm the character and appearance of the area” Wow that is some quote considering state of the place.
By anon
I don’t understand this at all, another example of a council being thick?
By Anonymous
This is a poor decision. Blackpool needs every attraction it can muster and the people wanting to invest should be applauded not rejected
By Janet
I wonder if certain local amusement park owners had any objection?
By Anonymous
Quite right, a struggling city which aspires to be a digital superpower cannot be seen to be frivolous nor can its engineering be obscured.
By Tannoy
@ August 18, 2026 at 5:04 pm
By Anonymous
The issue is townscape. Does it attract or detract from the appeal of what makes Blackpool’s seafront appealing.
By Rye
Right decision. These rides would be an eyesore in this location. The character of the prom should be enhanced, not made worse.
By Mr P