MIPIM UK | ‘Manchester has never had so much power’

Esther McVey, housing minister, has said Manchester “needs to make sure it lives up to the powers it’s already got, and the significant support it has had from this Government”, particularly in pushing through the delayed Greater Manchester Spatial Framework.

Giving the opening address at MIPIM UK in London this week, the minister said the property sector needs to “stretch, and stretch even further, and considerably so” to meet the demand for homes, but stressed her focus on developing affordable homes “does not mean tearning up Green Belt… I’m passionate about using brownfield first and that we utilise this fully”.

McVey also discussed investing in infrastructure, ensuring communities are listened to and “given what they need”.

While the Government devolved planning powers to Greater Manchester several years ago, leading to the need for the 20-year spatial framework to guide development in the City Region, the implementation of the GMSF has been repeatedly delayed, most recently due to a deadlock between the Greater Manchester Combined Authority and Whitehall over what type of legislation the document should be.

When asked by Place North West whether this lack of co-operation demonstrated the Government was not truly willing to follow through on its devolution promises, McVey said: “The Government has made devolution a key enabler.”

“Manchester has never had so much power, but you have to make sure with powers comes responsibility, and there’s checks and balances in place.

“It needs to make sure it lives up to its powers that it’s already got, and the significant support it has had from this Government.”

At the Conservative Party Conference in Manchester earlier this month, Greater Manchester Mayor Andy Burnham blamed “the dysfyunctionality of Westminster” for the delays: “We’ve been waiting for regulations and still are.”

Last month saw confirmation of a further delay to the GMSF, ruling out any final form coming forward before the May 2020 mayoral elections.

The evolution of the document over the past five years has seen the numbers of homes drop from 230,000 to 201,000, and a reduction in the proposed use of Green Belt land. Some Green Belt release is still required, and the latest delay hinges on the Combined Authority’s decision to pursue the GMSF as a Spatial Development Strategy, a type of legislation which does not allow for Green Belt release. The GMCA had been attempting to convince Whitehall to allow them to still be able to release Green Belt under this format, but this has met with resistance.

Under a different form of document, the GMCA will be required to submit further evidence, which would likely yield further delays.

Your Comments

Read our comments policy

GMCA have fudged it. The legislation is clear and they know that further evidence would require an increased housing target.

The sway that the city regions NIMBY’s has on our politicians is huge and it does no favours to our kids wanting a place of their own in 10 – 15 years time.


1 delay understandable, 2 delays unfortunate, 6 delays to the GMSF is just poor and reflects badly on gm and its devolution aspirations.

By Interested observer

No problem with trying to use as much brownfield land as possible to develop new housing. However, when all the GM Boroughs have had to allocate Green Belt land to meet their housing needs, surely its time to stop pandering to the “never build on the Green Belt” NIMBYS and for the GMCA to accept that, to move forward, some difficult choices have to be supported to ensure inclusive growth happens across GM and not just in centre of town.

Not holding my breath waiting for this mind …..

By Depressed Latic

Devolution is a failed dead duck led by B list former MPs. Manchester haven’t even agreed its own spatial framework after many failed attempts.

By John Smith

Empty, meaningless statements from probably one of the most ineffective and vacuous government ministers. Seriously, what is McVey talking about?

By Esther McVague

Ed – does your policy of not impersonating people (or posting offensive/defamatory/rude/personal comments) go as far as removing comments from Esther McVague?

By Bill

Tell us something we don`t know Esther.

By Michael McMoaner

Related Articles

Sign up to receive the Place Daily Briefing

Join more than 13,000 property professionals and receive your free daily round-up of built environment news direct to your inbox


Join more than 13,000 property professionals and sign up to receive your free daily round-up of built environment news direct to your inbox.

By subscribing, you are agreeing to our Terms & Conditions and Privacy Policy.

"*" indicates required fields

Your Job Field*
Other regional Publications - select below