Buxton Road, Hollins Strategic Land, c Google Earth snapshot

Half of the homes would be available on affordable tenures. Credit: Google Earth

Hollins puts in for 100 Hazel Grove homes

Two plots totalling more than eight acres near the junction of the A6 and the airport relief road are earmarked for development by the land promoter.

Hollins Strategic Land has lodged two applications for a total of 106 homes on the sites, which are separated by Buxton Road.

The larger of the two sites, six acres north of Buxton Road, is earmarked for 75 homes.

The smaller of the two plots measures 2.4 acres and is located south of Mill Lane. It would accommodate 31 homes under Hollins’s plans.

Both sites are currently designated as Green Belt and both schemes would provide 50% affordable homes and a mix of one- and two-bed flats and two-, three-, and four-bed houses.

Satplan is advising on planning matters and E*Scape is leading on design. To learn more, search for reference numbers DC/099219 and DC/099220 on Stockport Council’s planning portal.

Your Comments

Read our comments policy

Any new doctors, dentist, school places roads, public transport improvements? Thought not…

More houses in a saturated community, brilliant thinking

By Anonymous

Yet again, any green belt land we’ve got they want to build on, get a grip lib Dems!!

By Anonymous

Lib Dems have spent the last 20 years telling us they are our champions for stopping green belt being built on. Yeh right! What a useless bunch they are. Now they will just roll over to all planning applications for Hazel Grove. There will be no more Green Belt left.

By Anonymous

Stop building and start redeveloping..

By Anonymous

No heed paid to the extra traffic clogging our already heavily used roads. No extra infrastructure either.

By Ruth Gay

Developers won’t be satisfied until every bit of green belt between Stockport and Macclesfield is built on. All they see are £ signs. They have no regard for congestion, pressure on hospitals/dentists/Dr’s Surgeries. Stockport council seems to think it will be a utopia, where everyone occupying these new developments will walk, take buses, or ride a bike and anyone needing to do anything else will have an electric vehicle and everyone will be so healthy, that they’ll never need a Dr. dentist, or hospital.

By Anonymous

They just never give up stealing green belt land .
Disgusting

By Anonymous

Affordable homes isn’t enough, all schemes need to have a portion of social housing!

By Anonymous

In the not too distant future there will be not a blade of grass to be found with the number of houses being built. The necessary infrastructure required is all too often insufficient for the needs of area. Increased traffic problems, air pollution and loss of habitat for wildlife. Creating unsustainable welfare gridlocks and need to drastically rethink strategies to benefit the whole of communities.

By Dave

We need our green belt land, where is the rain supposed to go, where is the wildlife supposed to live? So much for green space is good for mental health. No, instead we build awful box houses with NO real garden back to back on any green space possible, adding lots more pollution to areas , it’s extremely worrying. We have many brown site areas, repurpose those and remember to also add, sewage treatment plants, rubbish tips along with schools/doctors of course this won’t happen…just cramped housing to maximise greedy profits and destroy once beautiful space!

By Anonymous

Infrastructure is needed first before any building commences

By Anonymous

More green belt land gone
Disgusting

By Susan smith

Save the
Green Belt

By Valerie Concar

More comments from people who don’t understand the purposes of Green Belt, who don’t understand the scale of housing need and who, in this case, probably live in houses that were built on the sort of land they don’t think should be built on to provide housing.

By One-eyed Ian

@ Ruth Gay July 24th at 21.57pm

You’re absolutely right 👍🏻

By G J Kitchener

@ Susan Smith July 26th at 10.50am

Excellent answer 👍🏻 need to save the green 👍🏻

By G J Kitchener

One eyed Ian you are 100% correct.

By Anonymous

Logical rounding off…. with not a 5 year housing land supply pot to tinkle in, pick your battles and get ’em built. Although 75 on that northern bit is pretty optimistic with the huge amount of water and sewerage infrastructure running underneath it!

By T.D.Smith

Related Articles

Sign up to receive the Place Daily Briefing

Join more than 13,000+ property professionals and receive your free daily round-up of built environment news direct to your inbox

Subscribe

Join more than 13,000+ property professionals and sign up to receive your free daily round-up of built environment news direct to your inbox.

By subscribing, you are agreeing to our Terms & Conditions and Privacy Policy.