Regent Park July , Henley Investments, c Mode Visuals

The scheme features 3,300 homes across eight acres. Credit: Mode Visuals

Henley commits to affordable homes at £1bn Regent Retail Park

The company behind controversial plans for a 3,000-apartment scheme featuring the UK’s tallest building outside London has committed to delivering 660 discounted homes as part of the project in the face of fierce opposition.

Henley Investment Management told Place the Regent Retail Park project will deliver 660 affordable homes – the first time the developer has publicly committed to a figure – but would not comment on any potential tenure mix.

As the freeholder of the site, Salford City Council is likely to push for a portion of the homes to be available for social rent.

While Henley has previously said the scheme would not be able to support affordable provision through the planning process due to viability constraints, talks over an alternative approach whereby a portion of the site could be handed over to a registered provider are at an advanced stage.

The right thing to do

Henley hopes that clarity on the affordable housing point will go some way to winning over its detractors, pointing out that the scheme would be one of the largest affordable housing projects in the city in recent times.

The developer admits it failed to adequately communicate how committed it was to delivering on-site affordable homes ahead of Salford City Council’s July planning meeting, with managing director Jay Squier stressing that the decision to do so was “not a sudden epiphany”.

“There’s land available for it here. We think it’s the right thing to do,” he said.

The commitment to affordable homes is likely to go down well with members and could tip the balance in its favour when the scheme returns to committee.

The project, which also features a park and plans for a medical facility, has the backing of city planners but a decision was deferred in July.

The planning committee failed to arrive at a decision amid the affordable housing concerns and complaints about the perceived loss of retail and the impact of the scheme on the local road network.

Regent Park July , Henley Investments, c Mode Visuals

A five-acre park forms part of the scheme. Credit: Mode Visuals

Salford MP Rebecca Long-Bailey is among the plan’s opponents and spoke at the meeting, describing Henley’s project as ‘a city in the sky’ and imploring members to refuse it.

Since then, Henley has continued to hold talks with the city council about a way forward for the project, which the developer is adamant is appropriate for its location.

Providing 3,000 homes across roughly eight acres, the scheme is dense.

“If you look at typical plot ratios, that would take 340 acres on the Green Belt,” Squier said.

“Our view is this is the right place to do it. It is close to city centre, it is low carbon, and it is low resource use to get those homes, compared to low density [development].”

Retail wrangling

Since acquiring the site in 2021 Henley has spent £5m drawing up its proposals and endured a bruising ordeal while attempting to push them forward.

Much of the objection has been from local Ordsall residents around the perceived loss of retail. The site currently comprises 118,000 sq ft of big box units occupied by the likes of Home Bargains, Boots, and several charity shops. These will be demolished to make way for Henley’s 10-building development.

After initial backlash, the developer has repeatedly said it plans to deliver almost as much retail space – 100,000 sq ft – in the new development and has invited existing retailers back to be a part of it.

However, this messaging has failed to cut through with locals.

Henley claims it acquired a retail park in a sorry state and has had to offer favourable terms to occupiers to keep it going.

“It was absolutely on its knees and would have been shuttered had we not stepped in and taken a medium-term view ahead of redevelopment,” said Henley development director Hattie Charlier-Poole.

“There aren’t many landlords that would keep it doing as well without a long-term view to redevelopment, and I think that is just not well understood.”

If she had her time again, Charlier-Poole would have tackled the retail point head on.

“If I knew as much as I do now about how it’s unfolded, then I would have led with that,” she said.

“We want local residents to feel reassured, we want them to feel like whatever we’re doing is for them as much as it is for anyone else. I think I would have tried to bring [them] on that journey earlier.”

Regent Retail Park, Henley Investment Management, c Google earth snapshot

The big box retail units that currently occupy the site will be demolished. Credit: Google Earth

The prospect of a London developer heading North to deliver 3,000 apartments on the site of a valuable community asset got the hackles of the local Ordsall community up almost immediately.

Charlier-Poole recognises that, as a new player, some hazing is to be expected.

“We’re new to the area and I think it takes a long time to build trust and really get under the skin of an area,” she said.

“That’s what we are working hard to do.”

Here to stay?

While retail and affordable housing have dominated the conversation around the development, another criticism has been levelled at Henley throughout the process – that the company is looking for a quick buck, to obtain planning permission and flip the site on.

This is false, according to Squier.

“I joined [Henley] to build buildings. We see that as the route to building out this site; doing it ourselves, and being very actively involved,” he said.

He pointed to a project in Ebbsfleet Henley is currently involved in as an example of the firm’s credentials when it comes to being a long-term custodian. That development will deliver 6,000 homes and has been ongoing for almost a decade.

“The value for us is the long-term project to build out the homes and that’s what we intend to do,” Squier said.

He added that, while tricky at times, the Ordsall ordeal has not put the business off investing more in the North West.

“Would we have preferred for it to have been easier? Yes.

“[But] we think there’s a there’s a lot we can do, and the more you do, the more you learn. The more we deliver, and the more credibility we get. There’s a virtuous circle.”

No date has been set for the Regent Retail Park scheme to return to Salford City Council’s planning committee but it is understood this could happen before the end of the year.

Assuming approval is forthcoming, Henley will have cleared what at times has looked like an unsurmountable barrier, namely the objections of a disgruntled local community.

However, the people of Ordsall are not going anywhere and you had better believe they will be watching closely as the project progresses.

Your Comments

Read our comments policy

As they acknowledge, the messaging could have been improved and they obviously weren’t expecting the grief they have had. Now the plans have changed, get it built! They could commit to employing a certain number of local workers / apprentices for the long construction period.

By Clouded Leopard

There used to be Council owned tower blocks on that site that were demolished due to there being low demand for them.

By UnaPlanner

I suspect a bit of research and local engagement wouldn’t have gone amiss beforehand and comments on shuttering the retail before getting a consent don’t make sense, nor does the we think its the right thing to do and it wasn’ t a sudden epiphany on the affordable. Great that its now being offered; what about all the other forthcoming city centre schemes, are they all still ‘viability’ hindered.

By Citizen Smith

With some luck, it will go ahead. The urban core of GM needs to be much, much denser if we’re to grow to the point of bringing all ten boroughs with us.

By Ben

I am sure the “epiphany” was realizing if they didnt do it then they had no chance of planning.

By J

This development should go ahead delivering much needed homes especially now with a commitment to build affordable homes to and will be great for employment .

By Anonymous

It’s just the city centre continuing to spill out in the direction of Salford. All part of the continuing gentrification of Manchester.The people of Ordsall have already seen massive change over the past 25 years..loads of flats around here now, just nothing this tall …yet.

By Anonymous

Approve it.

By Verticality

Outline planning only. Flip, flip, flip alert!

By Anonymous

It’s a nightmare of a congested road.. will these home “owners” walk to work? Buses…tram.. how will food get to them.. or they get to food.. there’s nowhere near as much retail there as there was 20 years ago.. will they go down the road to Eccles to shop? .. there’s nothing really the other direction

By Anonymous

@anonymous 6:20 – maybe the massive Sainsbury’s that this will be next door to might be the clue to unlocking the ‘how will food get to them.. or they get to food’ mystery

Personally I think this is too tall – mid-rise/’gentle densification’ would be more sensible but profitab- sorry viability, seems to be a regular refrain for every developer near the city centre. I’m guessing they’d be completely incapable of building somewhere that didn’t already have massive amounts of transport infrastructure nearby, a major city centre to provide access to amenities, etc

By Salfordian

There’s nowhere near as much retail as everyone shops online.
Are people really stupid enough to keep wondering why shops are closing and think it’s just ‘their’ shops? It’s happening all over the world.

By Anonymous

Salford/ Manchester skyline needs this… approve please…

By Richard

The SCC planning committee should be commended for having a recommendation for approval and deferring the decision, which has resulted in a policy compliant affordable housing offer. Trafford planning committee could learn a thing or two, given they seem happy to wave through major residential planning applications with no viability assessment.

By Anonymous

I am struggling with the inverted snobbery attached to this development. Affordable housing is what exactly? We had affordable housing in Central Manchester, in the shape of the Hulme crescents, and the high rise flats on Oldham Road when I was a teenager. Those places were an embarrassment, and if we want to return to that type of affordable housing, then in 20 years time, we will be living yet again with what was known as “The worst slum in Europe.” I can’t afford to live on Deansgate, so I live where I can afford.

By Elephant

@Elephantm Hulme Crescent wasn’t affordable housing, it was social housing – completely different things. Affordable housing has no “official” meaning, but what is usually meant is private homes sold at 80% of market value. Social housing is housing owned by the council and provided to people on very low income. They were built very cheaply and require constant government funding to maintain, of which usually dries up the moment conservatives get in power. These are not social housing.

By EOD

Thank you EOD for your interpretation, and you make a solid point but affordable means different things to different people. I think Rebecca Long-Bailey’s view of affordable, is more the Hulme Crescents, than your interpretation of affordable. We have to get beyond this coming up,each time there is a new development, as it is stumping progress and let’s be honest here, 80 percent of these prices is still a fortune, for most people.

By Elephant

Related Articles

Sign up to receive the Place Daily Briefing

Join more than 13,000+ property professionals and receive your free daily round-up of built environment news direct to your inbox

Subscribe

Join more than 13,000+ property professionals and sign up to receive your free daily round-up of built environment news direct to your inbox.

By subscribing, you are agreeing to our Terms & Conditions and Privacy Policy.

"*" indicates required fields

Your Job Field*
Other Regional Publications - Select below
Your Location*