Govt active travel scheme, p ATE

An afterthought no more - government is pushing for active travel to be considered at the design stage of a scheme. Credit: via Active Travel England

Active Travel England must now be consulted on major planning apps

Projects of or exceeding 150 homes, 80,700 sq ft, or 12 acres must now go before the government executive agency before they can be granted planning permission.

This equates to around 3,100 applications a year for Active Travel England to review, according to government estimates.

Making ATE a statutory consultee will help ensure the proper active travel infrastructure in future developments. Though it will be consulted on applications, ATE will not have any powers to control a planning application’s outcome.

“Designing activity back into our neighbourhoods and creating places where children have transport independence is achievable – it just needs smart planning,” said active travel commissioner Chris Boardman.

“As a statutory consultee, ATE will work with planning authorities and developers to help them ensure new estates give people what they need to get fresh air and exercise, save money on petrol and help fight climate change.”

Industry professionals in the North West welcomed the decision to make ATE a statutory consultee.

“It’s good to see that Government is committed to ensuring active travel is fully considered within placemaking and creation more generally, rather than just being seen as an infrastructure issue,” said Tom Roberts, technical principal at Mott Macdonald.

“The relationship between how people choose to move and urban density especially has been long overlooked in the UK,” he continued.

“It will be interesting to see how these new teeth will play out within a predominantly low-density volume housebuilding model, and with local highways teams who have experienced considerable cuts to their budgets over recent years.”

Annabel Precious, regional director of Civic Engineers, had similar thoughts, calling the move a “step in the right direction”.

“It not only raises awareness and understanding of active travel and its benefits but it also allows Active Travel England to take a proactive role in encouraging and training local authorities who are the ones ultimately determining the planning applications,” she said.

“Hopefully this is just a first step, as it’s only by including active travel in all future developments that we can really start to change behaviours and mindsets and ensure our towns and cities are designed around people and not the car.”

Neil McAlpine, director of transport and movement planning at LUC, was also positive about the change.

“We often find that active travel is not at the heart of the project from the start, often due to differing priorities from the design and the local authority teams,” he said.

“The inclusion of Active Travel England is a positive step forward to encourage placemaking and active travel to be a key component of a site design from the very outset. This would have positive benefits for all as the health and wellbeing impacts of active travel will be embedded into the site design.”

Your Comments

Read our comments policy

Excellent news.

By SW

Really pleased to hear this!

By Mancunian

So this will further slow the application process down, add further cost to the applicant, ultimately ending up gifting ransoms to bus operators and coupled with yet more delay. Nice on paper and talking shops, not so great in reality

By Tannoy

@Tannoy What have bus operators got to do with active travel? Do you only promote dull car-dominated schemes?

By CG

Great news and simple solution to help push the active travel agenda.

By Anonymous

I would have thought that as Local Highways is already consulted and should active travel maybe be put inside their remit rather than have another consultee doing what the local highways authority should be doing anyway?

By Anon

Active Travel England might need to staff up to meet this requirement.

By WayFay

Very good news, it’s depressing how car-dependent most new builds are

By Anonymous

Stupidity prevails again

By Gilly

Methinks ‘Gilly’ is on the wrong side of history.

More power to ATE.

By SW

Related Articles

Sign up to receive the Place Daily Briefing

Join more than 13,000 property professionals and receive your free daily round-up of built environment news direct to your inbox

Subscribe

Join more than 13,000 property professionals and sign up to receive your free daily round-up of built environment news direct to your inbox.

By subscribing, you are agreeing to our Terms & Conditions and Privacy Policy.

"*" indicates required fields

Your Job Field*
Other regional Publications - select below