Treasury announces £1.7bn for Northern cities
City Investment Funds were just the start of chancellor Rachel Reeves’ announcements on Tuesday for reshaping the Northern economy – she also teased additional fiscal devolution measures that would provide mayors with control of some of the national tax income.
“The North of England has waited for far too long, for a government that matches warm words with concerted ambition,” Reeves said during her annual Mais lecture at Bayes Business School.
City Investment Funds
A mixture of grant, loan, and patient capital funding, the £2.3bn City Investment Funds will be given out to the mayors of Liverpool City Region, Greater Manchester, West Yorkshire, South Yorkshire, the North East, and West Midlands.
The money is geared towards addressing viability challenges surrounding regeneration, housing, and transport-linked projects.
City Investment Funds are in addition to the £500m Mayoral Revolving Growth Funds announced last year.
Northern mayors will have access to £1.7bn of the £2.3bn CIF pot.
The CIF programme breaks down to £1.5bn through a new Housing Acceleration Fund – which all mayoral strategic authorities, including East Midlands Combined Authority, will be able to bid for cash from. Funds from the HAF will come via financial transactions. Exact allocations from HAF are still be decided.
The remaining £800m is the City Densification Fund, which seeks to do exactly what its name says, backing projects for housing, offices, and transport.
West Midlands secured the most CDF cash, with £180m going to the combined authority.
GMCA earned the second most, with £175m allocated. West Yorkshire was awarded £145m. The North East claimed £120m. Liverpool City Region won £95m and South Yorkshire has received £120m.
More details are due to be announced in the Autumn Budget.
Keeping taxes in the North
The national tax changes will be detailed in the Autumn Budget. However, Reeves did reveal that income tax would be among those explored for deployment to mayors. She clarified that this would not mean higher taxes, but simply reshaping who controls the funds.
“Reforms will be fiscally neutral, focused on sharing and retaining a portion of existing revenues, with the proceeds of growth benefiting the places that generated that growth, while managing volatile receipts both for local areas and for the Exchequer,” she said.
“These reforms will represent a permanent transfer of power and resources – not another exercise in local ambition frustrated by central government control – with taxpayers able to see what is being delivered with their money, and to hold local leaders to account for the results.”
Reeves added: “What I am describing is a genuine break with the past.
“A generational opportunity for Britain’s regions to make their own future.”
Mayoral reactions
“Where you grow up shouldn’t determine how far you can go in life,” said Liverpool City Region Mayor Steve Rotheram.
“For too long, brilliant young people across the North have felt they had to leave home to find the opportunities they deserve. That’s never been about a lack of talent – but a lack of opportunity and investment.”
The CIF announcement and commitment towards a Northern Growth Corridor supporting the entire North, Rotheram continued, sees national government looking to change that.
“The Chancellor’s support for the Northern Growth Corridor recognises what many of us have known for a long time – the North already has the talent, the ideas and the drive to succeed. With the right backing, we’re ready to turn that potential into jobs, growth and opportunity for millions of people.”
Greater Manchester Mayor Andy Burnham said: “We have long made the case for the North as the UK’s biggest growth opportunity and it is great to see the chancellor giving it such strong backing.
“Over the past decade, Greater Manchester has become the UK’s fastest growing city-region and in the next we are ready to go even further and faster. We have a plan to re-industrialise the birthplace of the Industrial Revolution and now have the necessary investment to deliver it.”
West Yorkshire Mayor Tracy Brabin said she shared Reeve’s “ambition to build on the emerging successes being driven by devolution in places like Leeds and Manchester”.
“This funding to help drive growth in the city centres of Leeds and Bradford, linked to the ongoing investment in Northern Powerhouse rail and TransPennine Rail Upgrade, is a vote of confidence in our ambitious plans for the region,” Brabin continued.
Oliver Coppard, Mayor of South Yorkshire, emphasised that the tide was turning for his region.
“For too long, South Yorkshire and the wider North have been failed, not only a by a lack of investment in our people, our businesses, our ideas and our infrastructure, but by a lack of ambition itself,” he said.
“But slowly, surely we’re beginning to see the South Yorkshire of the future taking shape – with world leading companies in industries of the future investing here, real income growth, and huge plans for the future, we’re starting to see the full potential of every part of Barnsley, Rotherham, Doncaster and Sheffield,” Coppard went on.
“The UK cannot realise its own economic renewal without places like South Yorkshire playing our full part, but together with this government we are now making that happen.”
North East Mayor Kim McGuinness said her combined authority was “investing record amounts” already to support new homes and jobs in the region.
“Today’s news of £120m more from the Government for the North East’s cities is a huge boost to our ambition as we deliver some of the country’s most exciting urban development projects,” she said.
A drop in a very large ocean..every little helps, just not much.
By Anonymous
Its good to see more money directed to the North, though Id like to know how the share was calculated. LCR has a much higher population than South Yorkshire and has more deprived areas, so why is South Yorkshire receiving 25 million more?
Don’t get me wrong, its great to see all the areas mentioned receiving funds, which hopefully help to unlock development and generate jobs and wealth. The issue remains that we still need major intervention in all areas of the North to make real long lasting positive change.
By GetItBuilt!
Not to be sniffed at, but you do wonder at the process under which allocations are made.
By Anonymous
@GetitBuilt! There’s notes on the allocation on the government website. They haven’t used per-capita population to generate the allocations they have used Gross Fixed Capital Formation which counts up the number of buildings of each type in a region, i.e. number of homes, warehouses, factories, retail units and then assesses whether there is a surplus or deficit of market supply (i.e. vacant). This approach is designed to separate it from property values where the money just goes where you get the largest BCR creating a self-reinforcing loop of investment going where you get the best direct financial return due to property values.
By WatcherZero
Sending income tax revenues to the regions is a materially significant next step in the devolution journey. Long overdue. Let’s hope the government makes meaningful progress before 2029.
By John Keyes
Hooray more cycle lanes for Steve meanwhile in GM a new rail underground
By Anon
Expect her to announce some huge London project tomorrow. This government usually throw a few crumbs at the regions prior to a massive infrastructure announcement for the South East. Don’t forget the billions they continue to throw at the Home Counties bullet train, better known as HS2.
By Elephant
Elephant – to which the arguement is London and SE pay the vast majority of tax in the UK.
By Anonymous
Elephant – you know that HS2 was the last tory governments project which they hopelessly mismanaged. Not sure the current government had much choice but to try and limp it over the line.
By Anonymous
To March 18, 2026 at 4:35 pm By Anonymous, incorrect. 45% I believe. Still high and sensible to invest elsewhere to reduce their tax burden. I’m sure you must agree.
By Anonymous
Lancashire County Council’s still sleeping and missing out. Hurry up!
By Anonymous
We need to get real and invest limited public cash in the cities with the greatest growth potential, rather than scattergun approaches of giving a little to each town and borough in the North.
By Anonymous
Pennies compared to what London gets and yet we’re supposed to be grateful for crumbs. No amount of wittering about ‘yeah well they pay most taxes’ will justify decades of underinvestment.
By Anonymous