Manchester pushes Water Street SRF forward
Executive sign-off is expected next week for an updated strategic regeneration framework guiding development in the area, mapping out the possibility of four towers and a park.
Manchester City Council has undertaken consultation this year on its plans to update the development framework for the 4.4-acre site currently occupied by Manchester Industrial Centre, and reported “overwhelming public support” for the proposals .
MCC said that more than 90% of respondents supported the key principles of the draft Water Street SRF update that will create a new city centre district developed around a new urban park, roughly the same size as the facility that has proven a winner across the city at Mayfield.
Dating to 2017, the existing SRF set out a preferred option for the council-owned MIC area made up of five blocks, with the tallest rising to 31 storeys, and around 900 homes. The 2026 iteration, drafted by SimpsonHaugh, sets out plans for a taller and denser development.
The SRF broadly sets out plans for a new landscape-led neighbourhood that combines new homes, including 20% affordable homes, improved public spaces, enhanced walking and cycling connections, and significant new green infrastructure centred around the River Medlock.
Particularly strong support has been recorded for the environmental and public realm improvements, the council said.
In all, 117 responses were received – 107 from residents, seven from businesses, and three from local interest groups or statutory bodies.
That followed 19 social media posts by MCC promoting the consultation, which generated 44,837 impressions, 774 link clicks, 239 reactions and 32 shares or reposts.
This is an updated framework that responds to developments that have moved ahead in recent years, such as St John’s and Enterprise City, Trinity Islands, Campfield, the completion of Potato Wharf, and the delivery of the Aviva Studios entertainments venue.
The report going before the executive reads: “Given the fundamentally changed context, the remaining land at Water Street presents a strategic opportunity to positively respond to that changed context along with delivering against the wider policy objectives for the city centre.
“The aspiration for Water Street in this update is therefore to provide a high quality, high-density residential-led proposition, within a high-quality environment that delivers a significant public park, enhances biodiversity, integrates with the River Medlock and connects to the rest of the city centre. This new open space needs to be flexible enough to support a range of activities and uses.”
MCC said that the framework also highlights opportunities to create new connections to Liverpool Road, St John’s and a potential future extension of the National Trust’s Castlefield Viaduct project.
Upon final approval, the new SRF will form part of a robust development brief for potential developers to engage the council as part of an open marketing disposal process anticipated to begin next year.
Cllr Gavin White, Manchester City Council’s executive member for housing and regeneration, said: “The wider Water Street area has seen major regeneration in recent years with world-class investment at St John’s and Aviva Studios on its doorstep, alongside impressive residential developments.
“This renewed regeneration framework will help guide investment to bring this area up to the same ambitious level with new housing, including affordable housing to create an inclusive new neighbourhood, complemented by a brand-new city centre urban park.
“This is a major opportunity to deliver an exciting new district, new jobs and green space, that will enhance the quality of life for existing and future residents, while helping to meet demand for quality new homes and support Manchester’s ongoing economic growth.
“In the remaining Water Street sites, we have a blank canvas with a huge amount of potential. We look forward to schemes being brought forward to deliver a unique space in our city centre.”


Interesting idea – devil in the wind tunnel detail…
By Quality matters
A shame that this doesn’t include a redesign of the huge, dangerous Regent Road / Trinity Way junction (or Water Street / Trinity Way)
By Anonymous
It all sounds good so far. I hope they can do the greenspace first like at Mayfield and that there is some creativity with the towers.
No more Ctrl+V SH-Renaker towers, please.
By Anonymous
Windy city
By Anonymous
I hope it’s not yet another SimpsonHaugh, 4, cut and paste, towers. Let’s see if SimpsonHaugh can design 4 intersting, exciting, and different looking towers, similar to the different looking towers proposed for the Liverpool Waterfront. (one example being, Kings – 70 storey tower)
By Mancunian
Some tough choices to be made. We want big green public realm. We want affordable housing. We want great aesthetics and finish. Pick one or maybe two, as you can’t have them all without a tonne of subsidy… viability is shocking and getting worse….
By Viability
The Medlock is a shallow brook not a RIVER.
By Anonymous
The design alludes to (at least) two more identical glazed towers, in an area that already has 2 twin glazed towers with another 2 twin glazed towers now underway. This area cannot become another Great Jackson street in which the city in enveloped with cluster after cluster of SH clone towers – it needs other design input and it needs some variety of materials before the skyline becomes completely sterile.
By Anonymous
Coming soon another really windy ‘not actually public’ public space with towers that look just like all the other ones around deansgate perfect for londoners moving to manchetser.
By Anonymous
Hopefully not just handed to Salboy or Reneaker to deliver but a credible developers are brought on board to drive the vision set.
By KatieT
This really is devoid of any imagination. Why would you pick the same architect that has done most of the towers to do more identical towers, makes no sense whatsoever. Will teh Council actually consider feedback or is this just a paper exercise.
By Anonymous
No more glass and metal please…not environmentally friendly and too many already in the area
By Anonymous
Not more towers! it will soon be so windy that it will be like Manhattan, where all the tall buildings mean people often get blown miles down the street. Down with this sort of thing!
By Mr. Windy
It would be nice is they could make Trinity Way, into an avenue, and put trees all along to Cheetham Hill Road. This could link the proposed St Catherine’s Woods Park, with this new park.
By Elephant
I like Elephants idea. Could also try and link to the new Cooper Park and forthcoming public realm as part of the Strangeways masterplan.
By Anonymous
More glass and steel towers with a nice green space please!
By Build up up up
Yet more horribly bland SimpsonHaugh/Renaker glass towers. SimpsonHaugh will never depart from the comfort zone they have created for themselves. Are they actually capable of any other designs than the checkerboard slick glass cladding that we’ve been used to?. Their designs are always predictable and the worst is the sheer mediocrity of
the designs for the podiums. We’ve all been calling out for new architects, new ideas, but nothing ever changes helas.
By John
MCC forming a team with people who know a thing or two about actually delivering schemes like this in their city. Liverpool City Council should take note instead of treating the development industry with such blanket disdain.
By Anonymous