Jon Matthews Architects designed Downtown Victoria North. Credit: via Philosophy PR

Puma pumps £50m into McGoff’s Manchester BTR

The investor is loaning the cash for Downtown Victoria North, a 237-apartment scheme off Rochdale Road that is currently under construction.

The £50m loan is the largest to date for Puma Property Finance. It also marks the eighth deal between Puma and McGoff Group.

Downtown Victoria North will bring 77 one-bedroom flats, 149 two-bedroom apartments, and 11 three-bedroom homes to Manchester. The apartments are spread against two blocks, the tallest of which is 13 storeys and the shorter being 11 storeys.

Downtown Victoria North was designed by Jon Matthews Architects and also includes a resident gym, lounge, and underground parking.

McGoff is eyeing an early 2026 completion date for the BTR project.

Puma director Tony Throp described Downtown Victoria North as being in “a prime location in Manchester”.

He also described why the BTR market is one that Puma wants to continue to invest in.

“The imbalance between supply and  demand in the UK rental market is well known, with many people having to push back home  ownership aspirations because of higher interest rates and unaffordable property prices, and private  landlords also leaving the market,” Throp said.

“Meanwhile renters are desiring higher standards of living than previously. The BTR sector therefore has a critical role to play in bridging this gap.”

Chris McGoff, director at the McGoff Group, said his company was glad to work again with Puma.

“The Puma team demonstrated great flexibility in a tight timeline to deliver this deal, and we look forward  to continuing to work with them throughout this development and in the future,” McGoff said.

Your Comments

Read our comments policy

I see some balconies, which is better than none.

By Balcony Monitor

What a fantastic scheme 👀 #Manchester’sFinest

By Chris McGoff

More gentrification no social housing. A utter disgrace. M.C.Council support huge property developers not local people needs.

By Yvonne McCalls

The apartments are too big, if we half them we can double the density

By Urbanist

Is the 2026 completion date correct? Seems a long programme for something already under construction now

By Bradford

@ Yvonne these are derelict land used for car parks, I don’t think you can call it gentrification.

By Anonymous

These are embarrassingly bad. Such a lackluster design for a gateway site.

By Heritage Action

Some people think that the signs of gentrification begin if they’ve tidied the skip at McDonald’s. Glad this site is being utilised.

By Anonymous

Yvonne, what are the needs of local people?

By Gilly

An alarming lack of understanding in the comments – i assume from people who aren’t actually contributing anything themselves and instead prefer to stand back and throw stones at those that are…

By Dangermouse

‘Gilly’

Read Yvonne’s piece in full – social housing is suggested.

By SW

Agree, alarming lack indeed. Social housing here? Deary me. Design good be better though.

By Anonymous

There’s also a case for social housing near the centre for people who work in lower paid cleaning and hospitality roles in the city centre.

By SW

Related Articles

Sign up to receive the Place Daily Briefing

Join more than 13,000 property professionals and receive your free daily round-up of built environment news direct to your inbox

Subscribe

Join more than 13,000 property professionals and sign up to receive your free daily round-up of built environment news direct to your inbox.

By subscribing, you are agreeing to our Terms & Conditions and Privacy Policy.

"*" indicates required fields

Your Job Field*
Other regional Publications - select below