Charles Street PBSA, IQ, p Turley

SimpsonHaugh is the architect behind the designs. Credit: via Turley

50-storey skyscraper features in IQ’s vision for Manchester PBSA overhaul

IQ Student Accommodation’s 2,500-unit reimagination of its Weston Hall and Pendulum Hotel site on Charles Street will deliver five buildings in total, including two more towers of 32- and 24-storeys.

The 50-storey element would be delivered in phase one alongside an 18-storey effort and a nine-storey link building. Phase two would see the 32- and 24-storey towers come forward.

Around 0.8 acres of landscaped public realm is planned as part of the development, which also includes amenities such as a gym, study lounges, and dining rooms.

To make room for this cluster of tall buildings, all the existing buildings on the site would be knocked down.

There are 528 student beds and 120 hotel rooms at IQ’s Charles Street site at present.

The redevelopment, if approved, would see a significant densification of the plot, providing a net increase in excess of 2,000 rooms.

Plans for the Charles Street project are being worked up alongside planner Turley and SimpsonHaugh Architects. Civic, Planit, and Cumming Group are also advising.

The site is located between two large Bruntwood SciTech developments; Circle Square on Oxford Road and Sister, the redevelopment of the former UMIST campus into a 4m sq ft innovation district.

IQ first trailed the plans for its Charles Street site in 2020 when it consulted on a development framework encompassing its Manchester holdings.

The framework set out plans for both Echo Street – a 1,200-unit scheme currently on site – as well as the Weston Halls and Pendulum Hotel site.

A vision for a 55-storey tower on the corner of London Road and Granby Row also featured in IQ’s 2020 thinking.

Overall, IQ operates more than 3,600 beds across 10 sites in Manchester.

Your Comments

Read our comments policy

it is so beautiful – I am crying

By Anonymous

Looks like a decent development. Would be great if they could uncover the Medlock, but appreciate the cost and mixing rivers with students might not be a good combo.

By GetItBuilt!

More density please

By Anonymous

Copy and paste

By Anonymous

OMG we’re the best

By Anonymous

… only 50 floors? Come on, go higher…! 50 is the last decade’s 34 floors. 70+ please! And a reference to the Pariser Building’s mad colours should happen.

By Nice but...

Great to see another skyscraper in the city! Perfect location for student beds as well, right next to the uni, surely there can’t be any objections to the practicality of this development?

By MC

I like the rectangular bit.

By Anonymous

I can only imagine that the critics on this site who go on and on and on and on and on and on about cut and paste design, don’t take the time and trouble to look at the detail of each scheme or look at them side by side……..but why should they when they can get ill informed comments published on a site like this

By Anonymous

SimpsonHaugh are literally the volume housebuilder of the tower sector. Copy and paste garbage. Great news for Manchester now but in 50 years people will be looking at this in the same way we look at former Soviet architecture now.

By Anonymous

Ohhh this is a great Month For Giant Skyscraper fan! This will elavate the city’s growth and Talls in the city Approve it now!

By Giant skyscraper Fan

However I do agree with @3.41pm should be 65 or 70 storeys but 50 storeys and 32 and 24 is good for us but 65 and 50 40 then 35 could be the way

By Giant skyscraper Fan

Honestly, who spend 7 years studying architecture to spew out this?!

By MacDopel

Another monstrosity by Simpson, again!

By Mike

“SimpsonHaugh is the architect”. Like that matters. All their buildings look exactly the same, even the receptionist can just copy/paste it and print it out for you.

By Anonymous

Ideal for students accommodation…oh hang on that’s what it’s for.

By Anonymous

I am an expert cladding evaluator and I can confirm that these look excellent on my computer screen. The council should approve this scheme without delay,

By Cladding fan

Although I agree that Simpson Haugh architecture all looks the same, the houses in Edinburgh New Town, all look the same. Uniformity sometimes works.

By Elephant

I agree with anon – 6:03 pm, some of the comments regarding towers in Manchester are ridiculous. Usual lazy throw out comments about all look the same ext. Yes they are all flat roofs and we could do with a few pointed ones but i am sure they will come. The materials on nearly every tower about 150 meters in Manchester is absolutely top quality.

By Bob

Looks like a distinctive, thoughtful development to add to Manchester’s skyline. 10/10 to the developers. Let’s hope it sails through planning!

By Anonymous

I haven’t done the numbers, but there now must be 50+ SH towers either built, under construction, approved or proposed in the city centre – people are entitled to want a little variety for the skyline. Yes, this scheme seems considered but there are too many towers by one practice – it is monotonous. Thankfully we have St Michael’s on the rise to break up the repetitiveness. Aside from Christopher Wren, no one architect should have a monopoly over a skyline..

By Anonymous

Sadly, it is just another boring thing on the horizon. Bring back the Elven Glade!

By Plinsky

You can’t help but laugh at some of the comments. It seems that some feathers were ruffled when another city got a taste of their own medicine.

Whilst the designs on this could certainly be more interesting, I don’t think it will be a bad filler if they use quality materials, which I imagine they will.

By Hehe

@Hehe you think they will use quality materials for student accommodation? Like the S&H ‘designed’ River Street Tower that has cladding that looks like plastic and there’s bits of it missing?

By Mike

There are of course lots of talls in Manchester now, most better than this one admittedly..Victoria, The Blade, Three60 etc but this is ok for student accommodation and likely better in the clad than one cgi can show. Talls always wake up the trolls for some reason. Not sure what about their insistent skyward thrustiness that they feel most intimidated by 😂

By Anonymous

There’s a lot of commentary that Simpson Haugh’s designs all look the same and yes, to a point, they do. But isn’t a consistent city identity a good thing? After all, these buildings will likely be torn down or reclad in 30 to 40 years, and the reshaping of Manchester will continue. Meanwhile, the city’s sandstone masterpieces will remain as enduring landmarks.

Overall, IQ’s scheme aligns well with Manchester’s Oxford Road Corridor vision, much like Circle Square and ID Manchester, blending PBSA with proximity to research hubs and tech clusters.

That said, I’m not a fan of monolithic PBSA blocks. They don’t allow for easily accessible external spaces that could be created by stepping the building. And frankly, the idea of a party on the roof of a 50-storey tower doesn’t bear thinking about. For that reason, I would expect – indeed, demand – that the internal social spaces are of the highest quality and offer diverse experiences.

In summary, Manchester has shown the country who really is the second city. Developments like this, alongside world-leading universities, excellent PBSA, and new co-living/BTR schemes, reinforce that position. The only question that remains is: what happens to the renting culture after that?

By Steve5839

These designs are awful, but let’s face it, this part of town is a dogs dinner and this is an improvement. It’s a shame, as a few slight tweaks to the facades and they would be great.

By Anonymous

You should see the towers in Leeds and Birmingham. Absolutely shocking quality. Liverpool starting to head in the same direction unfortunately. The charm of the waterfront has been obliterated.

By Anonymous

I think we should take advantage of anon 2.47 knowledge and expertise and invite him to inform us of the small tweaks that would make this scheme great…….he would be doing a real public service…….i for one can’t wait to here from him

By Anonymous

Absolutely abysmal. Manchester accepts the lowest of the low architecturally.

By Heritage Action

Surely there’s a way to deliver in a budget constraint and not sacrifice all architectural merit?

By Tom

Need to stop dumping sewage in the Medlock or the new residents of this development will be in for a nasty surprise.Just ask anyone who lives or socialises in the area how bad it gets

By Anonymous

Related Articles

Sign up to receive the Place Daily Briefing

Join more than 13,000+ property professionals and receive your free daily round-up of built environment news direct to your inbox

Subscribe

Join more than 13,000+ property professionals and sign up to receive your free daily round-up of built environment news direct to your inbox.

By subscribing, you are agreeing to our Terms & Conditions and Privacy Policy.

"*" indicates required fields

Your Job Field*
Other Regional Publications - Select below
Your Location*