Beetham Plaza New Hotel

Bucket fountain could still be moved despite heritage listing

Charlie Schouten

The sculpture in Liverpool, now owned by Elliot Group following its purchase of Beetham Plaza earlier this year, could still be moved despite a listing by Historic England, with two sites under consideration for its relocation.

The fountain commemorates the start of the controversial Tryweryn Water Scheme, which led to the displacement of 70 residents of Capel Celyn village after it was flooded.

Commissioned in 1962 and delivered by Richard Huws, the fountain sits at the centre of Beetham Plaza, although its original site was intended to be at the junction of Bold Street and Hanover Street.

After buying Beetham Plaza in January this year, Elliot Group had proposed to relocate the fountain to accommodate plans to build a 100-room aparthotel to be occupied by Epic, with Falconer Chester Hall as architect.

The developer submitted an application earlier this year but in May asked for the application not to be considered pending a possible listing by Historic England; that listing has now been confirmed by the heritage body and following a campaign supported by local councillors including Cllr Nick Small.

Elliot Group director Elliot Lawless welcomed the listing and added that two sites were still being considered for the fountain’s relocation, one of which is understood to be Williamson Square.

“We’re proud to own such a wonderful piece of Liverpool heritage.  It’s got a fascinating back-story and is a unique piece of engineering,” he said.

“We entirely respect Historic England’s ruling but listing does not, of itself, preclude the fountain from being moved to a more prominent location where more people can enjoy it.  We’re still considering that option and are discussing two possible sites with the council.  There’s quite a bit of work to do in that regard and I have a team of heritage consultants advising me.

“In the meantime, I’m hoping that this news will encourage more people to come and see and enjoy it in its current setting.

“Residents in Beetham Plaza and others in the area have long complained that it can attract anti-social behaviour and so more visitors will help eliminate that sort of nuisance.  We’ll also begin a programme of maintenance and improvement to the fountain, as we take our role as custodian very seriously.”

Elliot Group is being advised by Stephan Levrant Heritage Architecture on Beetham Plaza.

The mixed-use Beetham Plaza was completed in the 1990s and includes 42 luxury apartments, the restaurants Etsu and Silk Road, 4,500 sq ft of offices, and an underground cark park.

Your Comments

Read our comments policy here

I’ve never seen antisocial behaviour in the area. Hilarious that this is being cited, when the replacement would be stag and hen party flats.

If this ends up in Williamson Sq or outside Lime Street, council officers and politicians can expect that decision, the timing of it, and their involvement to be scrutinised.

By Mike

They should stop wasting all that water:)

By q

It’s a fascinating piece of engineering and sculpture combined. The present site wasn’t the original intended site and the fountain looks rather forlorn in the present location. There’s o particular reason intrinsic to the sculture to retain it on the present site. I’d agree – move it so that it has greater prominence.

By Liver lad

Absolutely agree with moving it to a more prominent sight. It’s a great piece of sculpture that deserves to be more widely-seen.

By TonyMc

Who planted these comments? Are you editing out ‘anti-move-the-fountain’ comments PNW?

By Roscoe

The bucket fountain is a 1960s creation sitting on a 1960s square right outside the old Planning Office that drew up all the 1960s plans. Beetham Plaza was Wilberforce House before Beetham redeveloped it. Keep it where it is, it works there!

By Roscoe

Elliot owns it now so he should decide with the council where to move it.

By Anonymous

How many times do we listen to the council pleading that it’s nothing to do with them guv when private development XYZ goes awry??

If it’s about what to do with private property then the council doesn’t have to be discussing anything. I would be quite unhappy if sparse council resource was being expended on any such discussion.

By Mike

Subscribe to our newsletter