Fund boss who targeted Moss Side clergy banned

An investment advisor from Manchester has been disqualified from being a director for seven-and-a-half years after his company went into administration owing nearly £2m.

Caleb Storkey of Moss Side ran Freedom Records Limited, which traded as Freedom Properties, from St Mary's Parsonage, 1 Parsonage Street, Hulme, Manchester and was placed into administration on 09 April 2008, with an estimated deficiency to creditors of £1,989,067. The company started trading in March 2004, dealing in property acquisition and management; sourcing properties for investment clients; carrying out refurbishment and construction projects; and acting as both letting and management agents.

The company obtained clients by advertising its services locally, especially to the Christian community. The investigation found that a number of Freedom Properties creditors were members of the clergy who had committed their savings to Caleb Storkey's business.

In signing his undertaking banning him from managing, controlling or being a director of a company until 2017 Storkey did not dispute that he:

  • caused the company to represent to its clients that deposit monies would be held on a client account, but they were not and utilised as general company funds. As a result 13 clients lost a total of £223,513;
  • repaid himself £47,038 between 01 January 2008 and 09 April 2008, under his director's loan, when he ought to have known that the company was insolvent;
  • failed to ensure that the company dealt properly with its tax affairs. The company only filed two VAT returns during its four years of trading, and the VAT debt as at the date of Administration was in the region of £210,000.

Vicky Bagnall, director of company investigations for The Insolvency Service, said: "The fact that Mr Storkey has agreed to a seven-and-a-half year disqualification undertaking should offer public reassurance. Where companies state funds will be held in client accounts pending completion of a transaction, as is common in property purchase, they must ensure that the funds are properly ring-fenced and not used as general funds."

Disqualification undertakings were introduced in April 2001, they are an administrative equivalent of a disqualification order but do not involve court proceedings.

Your Comments

Read our comments policy

Related Articles

Sign up to receive the Place Daily Briefing

Join more than 13,000 property professionals and receive your free daily round-up of built environment news direct to your inbox


Join more than 13,000 property professionals and sign up to receive your free daily round-up of built environment news direct to your inbox.

By subscribing, you are agreeing to our Terms & Conditions and Privacy Policy.

"*" indicates required fields

Your Job Field*
Other regional Publications - select below