DfT graded road maintenance performance. Here’s how North West councils did
Wigan Council and Manchester City Council received “green” scores, while Bolton Council, Westmorland and Furness Council, and Cumberland Council were given “red” status.
The Department for Transport looked at the performance of 154 local authorities across England when it comes to potholes, resurfacing, and improving road resilience. Using a traffic light-themed system, the worst-performing councils were given red scores, while the best received green.
Most local authorities were granted “amber” status. You can scroll down to the bottom of this story to see the full list of North West councils and how they were graded.
Wigan Cllr Paul Prescott, the authority’s cabinet portfolio holder for planning, environmental services, and transport, welcomed DfT’s green score for the council.
“Wigan Council is one of only 16 out of 154 councils to achieve a ‘green’ rating for the conditions of our road network, which includes more than 1,000km of roads. This places us in the top 11% in the country,” he said.
“We take the approach that ‘prevention is better than cure’, with proactive works to tackle problems before they happen,” Prescott continued.
He detailed how the council invests 90% of its roads budget on preventative maintenance. He added that the council also reacts quickly to issues when they occur, with 99% of emergency highways problems repaired in less than 24 hours.
While Wigan Council celebrated its achievement, Westmorland and Furness Council had questions regarding the ranking.
The council noted that it had received an amber grade on each of the three categories the DfT explored when scoring: the current condition of local roads, how much is spent on maintaining local roads, and how effectively best practice for maintenance is used.
Westmorland and Furness Cllr Peter Thornton, cabinet member for highways and ICT, said: “We do not understand why amber ratings in the three categories are then translated into an overall red rating, which we do not accept reflects the overall performance of our rural authority.
“Our network has scale, rurality, and historic assets which make maintenance uniquely challenging, but we are determined to meet these challenges head-on and build on the progress already achieved.”
Westmorland and Furness Council and Cumberland Council faced an additional hurdle with the DfT ranking as well – as new councils they could only provide three years of data rather than the five years required by DfT.
Thornton said: “As a new authority with a limited range of data to offer we will be actively engaging with the DfT to understand the methodology behind the overall rating and to identify steps for improvement.”
The Association of Directors of Environment, Economy, Planning, and Transport – a body that represents council place directors and their teams – asked for clarity on DfT’s methodology.
ADEPT’s president is Angela Jones, who is also the director of thriving places at Westmorland and Furness Council.
Jones said: “We need to ensure the ratings fairly reflect genuine progress across different local authority areas – in the future, we believe local authorities should have the opportunity to verify data and clarify any factual questions before ratings are published, to ensure accuracy and build confidence in the system.”
She continued: “While the £7.3bn investment announced in the Budget last year represents a step forward, it follows decades of underfunding that left local roads in a fragile state – it is just the start of what is needed to tackle the £17bn repair backlog that continues to grow.
“Road condition isn’t simply a measure of council performance – it reflects historic funding levels, traffic volumes, network size and weather impacts.”
Jones said multi-year funding certainty for road maintenance would make a massive impact for councils, enabling them to focus on preventative maintenance. This certainty is part of what the government’s £7.3bn commitment promised.
“However, after decades of underinvestment, it will take time before we see the rate of deterioration slow and meaningful improvements in network condition.”
How North West councils were rated
Cheshire
Cheshire East Council Amber
- Condition: Amber
- Spend: Green
- Best practice: Amber
- Overall: Amber
Cheshire West and Chester Council
- Condition: Amber
- Spend: Green
- Best practice: Amber
- Overall: Amber
Warrington Council
- Condition: Green
- Spend: Green
- Best practice: Amber
- Overall: Amber
Cumbria
Cumberland Council
- Condition: Amber
- Spend: Amber
- Best practice: Amber
- Overall: Red
Westmorland and Furness Council
- Condition: Amber
- Spend: Amber
- Best practice: Amber
- Overall: Red
Greater Manchester
Bolton Council
- Condition: Amber
- Spend: Red
- Best practice: Amber
- Overall: Red
Bury Council
- Condition: Amber
- Spend: Green
- Best practice: Amber
- Overall: Amber
Manchester City Council
- Condition: Amber
- Spend: Green
- Best practice: Green
- Overall: Green
Oldham Council
- Condition: Green
- Spend: Green
- Best practice: Red
- Overall: Amber
Rochdale Council
- Condition: Amber
- Spend: Green
- Best practice: Red
- Overall: Amber
Salford City Council
- Condition: Amber
- Spend: Green
- Best practice: Amber
- Overall: Amber
Stockport Council
- Condition: Amber
- Spend: Green
- Best practice: Amber
- Overall: Amber
Tameside Council
- Condition: Amber
- Spend: Green
- Best practice: Red
- Overall: Amber
Trafford Council
- Condition: Amber
- Spend: Green
- Best practice: Red
- Overall: Amber
Wigan Council
- Condition: Green
- Spend: Green
- Best practice: Amber
- Overall: Amber
Lancashire
Blackburn with Darwen Council
- Condition: Amber
- Spend: Green
- Best practice: Green
- Overall: Amber
Blackpool Council
- Condition: Amber
- Spend: Green
- Best practice: Green
- Overall: Amber
Lancashire County Council
- Condition: Amber
- Spend: Green
- Best practice: Amber
- Overall: Amber
Liverpool City Region
Halton Council
- Condition: Amber
- Spend: Green
- Best practice: Amber
- Overall: Amber
Knowsley Council
- Condition: Amber
- Spend: Green
- Best practice: Amber
- Overall: Amber
Liverpool City Council
- Condition: Amber
- Spend: Green
- Best practice: Amber
- Overall: Amber
Sefton Council
- Condition: Amber
- Spend: Green
- Best practice: Amber
- Overall: Amber
St Helens Council
- Condition: Amber
- Spend: Green
- Best practice: Amber
- Overall: Amber
Wirral Council
- Condition: Amber
- Spend: Green
- Best practice: Green
- Overall: Amber
Related Articles
Analysis - Commentary
Bright spots in Birkenhead regeneration: bringing Eastfloat back to life
Collective efforts to regenerate the Birkenhead area are a long time in the making and have been hard-fought. Project overruns and intense scrutiny over the use of public funds have cast a long shadow, but we have entered 2026 amid an undeniably bright spot of positive progress, writes Sebastian Gardiner of Peel Ports Logistics.
Spend seems at first sight to reflect how much is being spent relative to the allocation received. This is an odd criterion. Spend ought to be judged against outcomes, so it reflects a judgement about Vfm. If that is already the case, then call it Vfm. If not, don’t assume that the more that is spent is necessarily an indication of effectiveness.
By Steve Harrison
As a regular driver in both Cumberland (red) and Manchester (green) these ratings do not reflect my experience on the ground!
By J
Manchester has two Greens and and Amber and scores Green. Warrington has two Greens and an Amber and scores Amber. Does Best Practice carry more weight than Condition?
By Wolfie
Value for money was weighted 33% while the other six performance metrics were weighted 11.1% each. The council was then deducted 5% points for failing to keep records or evidence of its spending in four areas for a potential maximum 20% negative deduction to its final score.
So for example Wigan was rated 86% for A Road Condition, 88.5% for B/C Road Condition, 69.5% for Ungraded Road Condition, 100% for preventative maintenance, 92.9% for red condition roads awaiting work, 20% for Green or Amber condition roads awaiting work, 90.2% for spending efficiency and zero deducted points for record keeping.
Bolton was rated 89.5% for A Road Condition, 85.5% for B/C Road Condition, 42% for Ungraded Road Condition, 88.3% for preventative maintenance, 47.9% for red condition roads awaiting work, 21.4% for Green or Amber condition roads awaiting work, 0% for spending efficiency, zero deducted points for record keeping.
Westmorland and Furness was rated 80%, 60%, 30%, 100%, 20%, 79.9%, 53.3% and ten deducted points for record keeping.
Cumberland was rated 85.5%, 69%, 30%, 81%, 30.2%, 57.7%, 45.6% with five deducted points for record keeping.
By Watcherzero
We now have a grading system for councils on pothole management, but securing compensation has become increasingly difficult. Many councils are leaning on the Highways Act as their “get out of jail card,” which allows them to reject claims if they can show regular inspections or claim they were unaware of the defect.
I recently supported a friend pro bono after his vehicle was damaged by a pothole. Despite submitting all required evidence, the council refused the claim with an incoherent explanation. When we challenged their response, they replied with a standard statement: inspections were carried out, and no defects were noted. It was clear this was a template response rather than a genuine review.
The next step was the small claims court, but my friend understandably got cold feet. This experience highlights a troubling trend: government lawfare being used to sidestep civic responsibility.
If councils are graded on pothole performance, shouldn’t accountability follow?
By Steve5839