How has Labour’s first year in power been for property?
There has been no shortage of announcements during an eventful first year in power for Keir Starmer’s party but the industry, while largely positive about the last 12 months, is awaiting detail about how promises will become reality before passing judgement.
Labour is less popular now than it was 12 months ago when the party swept to power at the expense of the beleaguered Conservatives.
There has been frustration from the left of the party about policy direction in relation to welfare and immigration as the looming spectre of Reform has influenced decision-making.
Concerns about impending tax rises are also impacting market confidence, while a spate of recent U-turns have, in the eyes of some, undermined the Prime Minister’s authority.
That being said, property, particularly the housing sector, has undoubtedly been one of the winners of Labour’s fledgling premiership.
The party has promised to deliver 1.5m homes by the end of the parliament and while almost everyone agrees that this target is unlikely to be met, the industry believes the steps Labour has taken to unlock the delivery of homes will see an increase in delivery overall.

Starmer has come in for criticism on the topics of welfare and immigration. Credit: UK Parliament/Maria Unger via CC BY-NC-ND 2.0; bit.ly/40heHCq
In the last 12 months Labour has pulled various policy levers in a bid to grease the wheels of the housing sector.
The concept of grey belt has been introduced as a way of freeing up more land for development, while many local authority areas have had their annual housing targets increased in a move aimed at putting councils under pressure to deliver more homes.
A refreshed £39bn affordable housing programme was warmly received and Labour’s 10-year infrastructure strategy outlines the government’s intentions to fix the country’s crumbling fundamentals from transport to the grid.
Homes England has been handed a mandate to take a more interventionist approach to regeneration – the agency recently acquired the former Merseyside Police HQ in Liverpool – while the National Housing Bank could leverage £53bn of private investment and deliver 500,000 new homes, according to the government.
Perhaps the biggest change proposed by Labour in the last 12 months is the promise to reform the Treasury’s Green Book approach to evaluating investment to ensure that projects in the North are judged more fairly.
Industry reaction
Despite these seemingly positive declarations, Rob Loughenbury, managing director of communications firm Lexington, has been underwhelmed by the Labour’s first year.
“Overall, I would give Labour 5 out of 10,” he said. “Some important and helpful decisions have been taken, but the jury is out on whether growth is happening because of, or despite, government interventions.”
He highlighted the reintroduction of higher housing targets as a positive but said he is unsure of how it might shake out.
“It remains to be seen whether local councils will respond positively through plan making and committee decisions, or alternatively if the Inspectorate has a busy few years of appeals ahead.
In year two of Labour, Loughenbury hopes to see fewer announcements and more action, especially from Homes England.
“In the coming months, we need to see more detail on how Homes England will operate in the regions as devolution gathers pace,” he said.
“The priority should be to create new partnerships, facilitate land assembly and join up pockets of expertise and resource, to attract more investment and get development moving on the key sites we are all so familiar with.”
Sean Fielding, associate director at Cavendish, said the size of Labour’s majority had brought with it stability but that the quality of leadership varied from department to department.
“There are ministers that are providing strong political leadership in their departments, and others who are very much not,” he said.
“Fortunately for us, the ones falling into the former camp are Deputy Prime Minister Angela Rayner and DESNZ Secretary Ed Miliband.
“Pledges on clean power by 2030, housebuilding and planning reform have seen businesses have the confidence to bring forward sites for development at a rate that I haven’t known since joining Cavendish in 2021.”

Onward Homes’ Bronwen Rapley welcomed the government’s social housing reforms. Credit: via Onward Homes
Michelle Spark, partner at Clarke Willmott gave Labour a six out of 10 for its first year in power, citing positive movement on the green agenda but sluggishness around infrastructure delivery.
“Undoubtedly, the government’s push for cleaner, more sustainable energy has spurred investment in green infrastructure,” she said.
“However, not all aspects of the infrastructure agenda have delivered positive sustainable results. In particular, there have been frustrations around the pace of delivery for large-scale infrastructure projects like the A66 Northern Trans-Pennine Project, which despite being granted development consent in March 2024, has yet to receive funding approval from government and is in limbo.”
The social housing sector is perhaps the one that has benefitted most from Labour’s election victory.
The £39bn AHP was described by Emma Richman, executive director of operations at Peaks & Plains Housing Trust, as a “tremendous boost” for the sector.
“I would say my sector can declare itself a winner [of Labour’s first year]”, she said.
She added that the government’s long-term rent settlement could be “transformational”.
“For decades, housing associations have suffered from rising costs, but they have had to accept a fixed, low rent. We can now increase rent by 1% above inflation for the next ten years. Housing associations work to 30-year business plans, so having this level of certainty for our financial projections gives certainty.”
Bronwen Rapley, chief executive of Onward Homes and chair of Homes for the North, said Labour’s first year has brought a “much-needed reset in housing policy”.
“It’s encouraging to see the issue rise up the political agenda, alongside recognition that regeneration and long-term investment are key to unlocking growth and opportunity.”
“Homes for the North looks forward to working with government to turn ambition into delivery. The North urgently needs new homes, revitalised places, and stronger communities – and with the right tools and collaboration in place, we are ready to help make that happen.”
They can’t last, they are far too left wing
By Anonymous
They’ve already run out of other peoples money
By The blob
No hard left government has ever delivered anything worthwhile, this lot are no different . They were a protest vote as the Tories were themselves so woefully inadequate. All we can do is manage them until they too are voted out as they assuredly will be and hope that the sector and indeed the country survives the damage as best it can.
By Anonymous
Too much unnecessary regulation, a civil service that acts as a hand-break on the pace of any change, and a naive assumption that sorting out the “planning system” will miraculously build 1.5m homes in 5 years. As Bernstein used to say “beam me up scotty”.
By Anonymous
There maybe other policy areas where the Government are not covering themselves in glory but when it comes to planning reform, support for regional regeneration, housing, transport, renewable energy, infrastructure and general construction they are a solid 7 out of 10. I’m hoping that we start seeing delivery this year which will improve overall growth and increase their rating with the general public.
By Anonymous
Housing associations are generally run these days in a very inefficient and arrogant and very tenant unfriendly and totally beurocratic manner . They need to sort themselves out big time .
By Anonymous
Tell me you don’t understand politics, without telling me you don’t understand politics. @anonymous 11.01am
By Green Belt Ben
They can not last, they are too right wing (Tory light).
By Anonymous
Too left wing? That’s hilarious
By Anonymous
And the Building Safety Regulator madness continues with Gateway 2 and Gateway 3 approvals (or lack of them) – forget about 1.5m homes in the term of this Government. No second term unless they can sort delivery out (in terms of timescales and cost control) – not something this country is very good at (2012 Olympics excepted)
By Anonymous
Labour have never done any favours for Liverpool
By Anonymous
“Other People’s Money” springs from the Community they are part of. You disagree? Ask Robinson Crusoe what he thinks.
‘s
By Anonymous
The 2012 Olympics were way overspent on the original budget and have questionable long term value for money benefits.
By Anonymous
Imagine thinking a left wing government could win a general election
By Anonymous
some here think it’s a hard left government, some think it’s a right wing government. Good to see no tribalism!!
By Levelling Up Manager
Labour will find out hard and fast that the majority of people don’t want these extra 1.5 million homes built over green spaces and natural habitats when they are voted out at the next GE.
By Rick Cleator
Left wing governments never last long..they always run out of money. Usually somebody else’s. The damage they’ve done to Liverpool over decades is only beginning to be fixed.
By Anonymous
It’s hardly a true left wing Government, although our politics have become so diametrically opposed and we flip flop each time rather than having sensible consensus to key issues such as infrastructure and housing etc. They’ve got no money or are unwilling to cut in certain areas & what they do have is being directed to areas where we see little change. I think the hypothesis of 1.5m homes is already farcical given the lacklustre economic climate.
By Alf Empty
Classic PNW comments on any housing article
“We want homes for our children to live in!”
Proposal for medium density flats on a brownfield site near transport links.
“Families can’t live in flats! There’s no parking!”
Proposal for houses with gardens on greenfield space with more land available
“Stop destroying our greenbelt! What about doctors/shops/schools?!”
By red rose