Hopes Carr, Tala Homes, p planning docs

The scheme would include access improvements to Hempshaw Brook. Credit: via planning documents

Tala braces for approval in Stockport

Plans for a 106-apartment development off Hopes Carr were favourably received by the council’s relevant area committee and are expected to be rubber-stamped later this week.

Tala Homes submitted a planning application to Stockport Council requesting permission to build an apartment block on the site of the former silk mill in January 2024.

The scheme, designed by Chase Architecture, would rise to seven storeys and comprise 38 one-bedroom apartments and 68 with two.

No affordable homes are proposed due to viability constraints.

Tala’s development also proposes the creation of a park around Hempshaw Brook, which runs roughly parallel to Hopes Carr.

Nearby, two blocks on the corner of Hopes Carr and Wellington Street next to Tala’s site were completed by Seddon in 2013.

To learn more about Tala’s plans, search for application reference number DC/090690 on Stockport Council’s planning portal.

Your Comments

Read our comments policy

With a council that is struggking with social housing/affordable homes back log, why are the council allowing a development with no affordable housing. Shameless

By LT

If they can’t provide a element of affordable housing because of viability they shouldn’t be allowed to progress.

By Anonymous

Then there’d be no new homes, making the problem worse….

By ALL

How many more apartments

By Margaret

Dear people commenting on this article – please read the article above about proposals to build on fields in Woodford so as to see the bigger picture.

By Sceptic

Margaret (April 29, 2025 at 11:56 am) – Stockport’s housing target is about 31,000 homes over a 15 year period. Apartments and other high density types of development (such as terraces) are the only way they will get anywhere near that, even with releasing a whole load of land from the green-belt (which they don’t want to do but will be forced to one way or another)

By Anonymous

We need housing for everyone, not just for people with well of jobs what about people on minimum wage

By Anonymous

Less people less housing needed..easy.Also resusing existing underused stock better. But none of that makes money and so the merry-go- round continues and we all have to pretend.

By Anonymous

Related Articles

Sign up to receive the Place Daily Briefing

Join more than 13,000+ property professionals and receive your free daily round-up of built environment news direct to your inbox

Subscribe

Join more than 13,000+ property professionals and sign up to receive your free daily round-up of built environment news direct to your inbox.

By subscribing, you are agreeing to our Terms & Conditions and Privacy Policy.

"*" indicates required fields

Your Job Field*
Other regional Publications - select below