Stockport Rugby Club, SRUFC Russell Homes, p.Butler Bancroft

Stockport Rugby Club and the residential plot are separated by Wallbank Road. Credit: via Russell Homes

Stockport to approve Green Belt double whammy

A pair of schemes in Bramhall and Hazel Grove are in line for consent this week as the council continues to make concessions to its brownfield-first approach to development.

At Stockport Rugby Club’s Memorial Ground in Hazel Grove, Russell Homes and the club are seeking permission for 60 houses, a 75-unit care facility, and a 70-apartment extra care scheme for over 55s.

This project has received 49 objections and more than 70 letters supporting the scheme.

Meanwhile, in Bramhall, Wain Estates wants to build 60 homes off Lytham Drive. This proposal generated 161 objections and three letters of support.

Both projects have been recommended for approval by Stockport Council’s planning team, despite being located in the Green Belt.

This is due in part to the council’s under supply of land for housing. The authority cannot currently demonstrate a five-year housing land supply, which has resulted in the loss of recent planning appeals in Cheadle and Hazel Grove. 

For this reason, members are advised to approve the applications by the council’s planning team. The authority concedes both will result in some harm to the Green Belt but that very special circumstances exist to justify development.

“The adverse impacts of granting planning permission would not significantly and demonstrably outweigh the benefits”, a planning report states.

Your Comments

Read our comments policy

The Oldham 31 – are you following this?

By Anonymous

More places for everyone

By Anonymous

Well, well, well. If it isn’t the consequences of their own actions.

By Bradford

The Lytham Drive development is shocking. Green belt is essential is there for a reason. Traffic is horrendous as it is, roads not built for heavy construction vehicles. Rush hour times given ate incorrect. Any safety consideration for safety of pedestrians, especially school children

By Anonymous

After more building work…. just a matter of time before the floods …. I’m going to set up a rubber rubber dinghy company company and I wil be a millionaire in no time

By Little Britain

There is very little green belt in and around these two areas – so leave them alone! Find grey / brown belt areas there are plenty.

By Helen Hodgkinson

If houses are going to be built on green belt then every possible attempt should be made to keep and improve some of the green space around them. Landscaping should be an important factor in the planning process to minimise the loss of habitat and green areas. Greener materials should also be important in the buildings and provision for a more aesthetic overall development.

By Paul Tavernor

No infrastructure planned for extra traffic? Whatever happend to the long promised A6 bypass? Hazel grove still has 4 lanes of traffic running through it!

By Anonymous

The mismanagement of the planning process by the councillors in Stockport is staggering. The chickens are coming home to roost and by complete coincidence Mark Hunter, the leader of the council is stepping down.

By Anonymous

The Bramhall one is hardly green belt – its got a few sheds and a repair garage on most of it! Brownfield development is exactly what the borough needs but there’s no convincing the NIMBYs

By Anonymous

Why bother having an objection procedure that the council then totally ignore

By Anonymous

I would of thought the hundreds of flats being built in Stockport is plenty without having to build on brown sites

By Anonymous

What roads and bypasses are planned? Stockport is becoming one big car park…

By Jaybblzz

If you voted Labour you’re getting what you voted for.

By Haha

Stockport has no choice but to build as the current Government and previous one have set targets which they have to meet. Most of the planning decisions are to be made by officers using the current planning law which Labour have decided on. It is effectively being taken out of the hands of local people. Stockport has no money to fight anything in court .

By JA

There are so many brown sites in the borough that should be used not greenbelt this is disgusting and all money nothing else not tge environment or impact on the services and infrastructure. Absolute shame on Stockport council for even considering these propsals

By Diane Gardler

And where is the additional infrastructure? Hmm yes thought not

By Jamie Evans

The Lytham drive plan is madness . The roads just cannot take it . It is a one track road with 2 schools near by. At school time it is mayhem now without the added traffic that this will cause .
Also what about medical care? The GPs and stepping hill hospital just cannot cope at present and with the Rugby club development as well with its mainly elderly population this will cause added problems.
All the above is without the problem of building on greenfield sites?
I hope that you will reconsider and stop these developments

By Phillipa Williams Williams

Everywhere choked as it is .this is ludicrous to fill these areas with housing and cars .

By Anonymous

This what no Local Plan looks like.. brought to you especially by Stockport Liberal Democrats 👏🏻

By Tony Miao

Think it’s dreadful the way these plans look as if

By Valerie Baines

Build housing on the unused industrial estates .. but no…. because green belts hold bigger profits11

By Anonymous

The rest of Jackson’s Lane will be next.

By Anonymous

Schools, GPs, Hospital facilities, roads-2 cars or more at each of the houses. Recipe for crisis!

By Anonymous

Build houses on all rugby clubs and public spaces

By YIMBY

JA – Yes central government set housing targets for local authorities to meet but it is for the councils to decide how they are delivered. The problem at Stockport is that they pulled out of the Greater Manchester planning framework without any alternative plan. The council in Stockport has repeatedly failed to draw up a local plan therefore allowing developers almost free reign to develop where they like including Green Belt land. The Lib Dem council are to blame and their leaders way of dealing with it is to run for the hills.

By Anonymous

So when do we get a new hospital.

By John.davies

So many planning experts commenting here and yet council’s still struggle to find planning experts they can employ.

By Anonymous

I support the new houses on Jackson Lane as im looking to downsize to a smaller house

By Anonymous

Absolutely disgraceful, not surprised that the council planning department has let the community down again

By Anonymous

I Hardly think that it’s high density housing and very much doubt if it will do little if anything to effect the housing situation, but it will make a tidy profit of a few…if the council are serious about the shortage why not built multi occupancy dwelling or even a couple of tower blocks…

By B.james

I’m 100% against greenbelt development but these are not really greenbelt.

By Pablo

Surely they should be holding people responsible? Personally, on a pedestal.

Otherwise, and similar to the rest of Greater Manc, I sit watching with popcorn.

By Anonymous

Of course the Green Be.t is important but a balance has to be struck between community need and the environment, achieved by design. The houses constructed need to be reasonably priced and purchase must reflect local earnings. Should contain elements for recreation and the natural world.

By Adrian Tay.or

Oh Dear! Are these new homes going to spoil your view? No problem we won’t build them but we are going to have to increase your council tax to £20,000 a year or perhaps we should create a tent city for all the homeless people. Its typical of the selfish attitude that has polluted Britain.If you don’t want the houses built there it’s simple MOVE ELSEWHERE!! and stop your moaning. Thank God Labour has put a stop to it otherwise NO!! houses would ever be built.

By Paul Moores

Lytham drive needs this we need more houses built away. Bramhall needs more houses
All the people moaning about loosing greenbelt half of their houses were built on it so get a grip

By Anonymous

I do enjoy reading the ludicrous hyperbole that emerges from local residents on these sort of schemes. You’d think their very existence was under threat.

By Anonymous

Labour chickens coming home to roost. They are going to pass every development and concrete over the whole of GM and only the truly naive will believe its ’affordable’ homes for everyone 😂

By Anonymous

Just who is this housing supposed to be for?
A limited amount of people will be able to afford them I’m sure.
Even if locals object as some did, it still goes through.
No point having Surveys, just a waste of time.x

By Sheila Giddings

Some of the attitudes on here show why sanity and reason have left the building when it comes to housing. ‘move somewhere else’ ? Deary me the keyboard chewers are out in force on this one!

By Anonymous

Fascinating mis of comments for and against! My two-penneth is simply to say that anyone that thinks congestion on Jacksons Lane is ‘horrendous’ and/or that this development will make it materially worse has no real grasp of travel demand and/or road capacity analysis…

By iykyk

Anonymous 12.24pm – The Lib Dems are in power in Stockport not Labour.

By Anonymous

I hope it gets approved! All these comments apposed to the development already sit in a cushy home. We ALL NEED A HOME!!!

By Anonymous

Related Articles

Sign up to receive the Place Daily Briefing

Join more than 13,000 property professionals and receive your free daily round-up of built environment news direct to your inbox

Subscribe

Join more than 13,000 property professionals and sign up to receive your free daily round-up of built environment news direct to your inbox.

By subscribing, you are agreeing to our Terms & Conditions and Privacy Policy.

"*" indicates required fields

Your Job Field*
Other regional Publications - select below