Manchester Road, Trammell Crow, planning docs

The scheme is made up of three units totalling 465,200 sq ft of industrial space. Credit: via planning documents

Rochdale loses appeal over 465,000 sq ft logistics scheme

Trammell Crow Company has had the refusal of its shed scheme in Heywood overturned in the face of protests from fellow developer Russell Homes, which argued the logistics project would devalue homes proposed within a neighbouring £400m masterplan.

Rochdale Council’s planning committee went against officer recommendations when it refused planning permission for the 465,000 sq ft redevelopment of the former Department for Work and Pensions’ distribution centre off Manchester Road last year.

That decision has now been reversed by the Planning Inspectorate, which sided with Trammell Crow following an inquiry held last month.

Rochdale’s planning committee had decided that the scheme “by virtue of its size, scale and form…would represent an overdevelopment of the site”.

A decision notice handed down by the council also said the project would have “detrimental and unacceptable impacts on the noise environment and the visual amenity of surrounding residents, with particular regard to future residents adjacent to the site.”

In addition, Russell Homes, which has outline consent for the 318-acre South Heywood masterplan nearby, has been a vocal opponent to Trammell Crow’s project throughout the planning process.

Russell claims the value of the 1,000 residential units within its masterplan would be impacted by Trammell Crow’s scheme.

However, inspector Benjamin Webb found “no convincing reason to believe that the overall delivery of South Heywood Masterplan, or the approved housing site’s role within it, would be compromised by [Trammell Crow’s] scheme”.

He also disagreed that the aesthetics of the scheme were problematic and added that the developer had taken steps to make the project more pleasing on the eye.

“The design of the proposed units is largely dictated by the function that they would fulfil,” Webb said.

“The incorporation of bands of colour across the top half of each elevation of the proposed units would provide a far more interesting and distinctive appearance than if each was left blank.

“I am content that the appellant has taken reasonable steps to secure ‘beauty’ in line with national policy.”

Trammell Crow was represented by well-known planning barrister Christopher Katkowski KC. Giles Cannock KC represented Russell Homes and Ian Ponter represented the council.

 

Your Comments

Read our comments policy

Perceived devaluation of properties (which haven’t even been built yet) isn’t a legitimate planning objection

By Anonymous

Related Articles

Sign up to receive the Place Daily Briefing

Join more than 13,000 property professionals and receive your free daily round-up of built environment news direct to your inbox

Subscribe

Join more than 13,000 property professionals and sign up to receive your free daily round-up of built environment news direct to your inbox.

By subscribing, you are agreeing to our Terms & Conditions and Privacy Policy.

"*" indicates required fields

Your Job Field*
Other regional Publications - select below