GM housing fund plans third Renaker loan

The £300m Greater Manchester housing fund is set to make its biggest loan so far; £70m to Renaker Build, to finance the construction of two skyscrapers at Owen Street, totalling 846 apartments.

At a meeting on Friday 16 December, the GM Combined Authority is being asked to approve the allocation to Renaker-subsidiary FQ Developments. The money would fund two towers of 66 and 44 storeys at the developer’s Owen Street development site, south of the city centre.

Renaker has planning permission for 1,500 apartments at Owen Street, across four buildings of 66, 52, 44 and 39 storeys, designed by SimpsonHaugh & Partners.

Work began on the first two blocks earlier this month. The second phase of 630 homes is due to start next year, with completion targeted for 2020.

Last year, Renaker was awarded £63m by the GMCA fund for two projects: £23m to LQ Investments for 300 apartments at Water Street in Castlefield, and £42.5m for 490 flats at Wilburn Street Basin in Salford.

If approved, the new loan would take the total received by Renaker from the GMCA to £132m.

The loan would also mean that almost £200m of the £300m fund has been allocated.

According to Bill Enevoldson, chief investment officer at GMCA, Renaker must have paid back the previous £63m in full, before receiving the £70m, in order to minimise the fund’s exposure to one developer. Renaker has already begun its repayment of the Water Street and Wilburn Street loans. Both projects are due to reach full completion next summer.

The £70m loan would mean 23% of the housing fund would be out to Renaker.

The £300m housing fund was created as part of the region’s devolution agreement. It launched in June 2015, and the GMCA has until March 2019 to draw down all of the money. The funds can be reinvested over a 10-year time frame, potentially delivering a total development value of £1.5bn.

With a limited time to draw down the funds, allocations to larger city centre apartment schemes allow GMCA to commit the finance faster, however Enevoldson highlighted that the fund has also backed smaller £1m projects in Wigan and Stockport.

Renaker is arguably the most prolific residential developer operating in Manchester, with apartment blocks recently completed at Manchester’s Cambridge Street and Salford’s Wilburn Street, active sites at Water Street and Owen Street in Castlefield, Greengate in Salford, and a planning application in for an additional Castlefield plot.

Speaking to Place North West, founder and managing director Daren Whitaker said that it was the developer’s in-house construction capabilities which meant it could speed up the build time.

“Having come from the background of a national contractor, a lot of design time, negotiations and legal time is put into selecting a contractor. Because we have that capability in-house, we can overlap that process, and get on site faster.”

Your Comments

Read our comments policy

Why are banks reluctant to provide the funding?

By Funding Panther

They can’t compete with the terms proposed by the GM Fund. I think questions need to be asked about the proportion of funds benefiting the big boys and the geographic spread. I wonder what spend has been focussed in Manchester/Salford – 90%?

By NC

If Renaker get things done then who are us mere plebs to question it. Manchester will benefit hugely from these developments, so long may it continue.

By The Squirrel's Nuts

Is this an interest free loan to private developers?

By Vi

I’d like to think the loan is revenue generating through interest… I’d also like to think the interest payments are quite high as it doesn’t seem right that a developer can make massive profit from a loan from public money. It’s only right if the developer pays back a lot more than they borrow.

Do banks still insist on a profit split with a developer when a building is sold? I guess that’s why these have chosen this loan as the terms will be better (greater return) for developer. I also find it funny when those with a vested interest in seeing projects move forward stating “yes but if (developer) couldn’t get a loan at a rate they’re happy with they won’t build it”. That’s their prerogative.

By Taxman

Related Articles

Sign up to receive the Place Daily Briefing

Join more than 13,000 property professionals and receive your free daily round-up of built environment news direct to your inbox

Subscribe

Join more than 13,000 property professionals and sign up to receive your free daily round-up of built environment news direct to your inbox.

By subscribing, you are agreeing to our Terms & Conditions and Privacy Policy.

"*" indicates required fields

Your Job Field*
Other regional Publications - select below