DeTrafford Gallery Gardens Planning

The site has permission for 366 apartments. Credit: via planning documents

Drum completes acquisition of stalled DeTrafford project

The Scottish outfit is now seeking to get the Castlefield site ready for its redevelopment into an apartment scheme.

Drum Property has completed the acquisition of DeTrafford’s stalled Gallery Gardens plot in Manchester, which has planning permission for 366 apartments.

Located off Ellesmere Street in the city’s Castlefield district, the £94m project entered administration in early 2023 without a brick being laid.

Now, Drum’s £2.25m deal has completed following a successful court application to clear the site’s title.

There were 72 unilateral notices on the title that were filed by investors who had paid a combined £2.1m in deposits for flats within Gallery Gardens that DeTrafford failed to deliver.

The latest report compiled by administrator BDO estimates these investors will get nothing through the administration process.

Lender Daiwa was owed £25.1m by the two SPVs attached to the Gallery Gardens project but Drum acquired that debt in 2024, as first revealed by Place North West.

Another lender, Maslow, is owed £11m by the Gallery Gardens vehicles by way of cross guarantees against other DeTrafford projects.

Unsecured creditors are owed £7.2m by the two companies, the majority of which is intercompany debt.

Under Drum’s ownership, the project could soon get going. The developer has applied for permission to demolish the buildings on site, namely a double storey former hardware store.

Drum was contacted for comment.

Most active in its Scottish heartlands, Drum also has schemes south of the border. Last year, the developer lodged plans for Whitehall Sidings, a 391-flat build-to-rent scheme in Leeds.

The firm was also one of the underbidders on the Stockport 8.

Your Comments

Read our comments policy

I mean, it’s just a bit miserable and two piddly trees? Come on. It’s a traffic-choked area. Needs more greenery than this please.

By Not very friendly design

Even the visualisation had temporary road barriers as a design feature. There are better ways to manage access.

By Gum

Related Articles

Sign up to receive the Place Daily Briefing

Join more than 13,000+ property professionals and receive your free daily round-up of built environment news direct to your inbox

Subscribe

Join more than 13,000+ property professionals and sign up to receive your free daily round-up of built environment news direct to your inbox.

By subscribing, you are agreeing to our Terms & Conditions and Privacy Policy.

"*" indicates required fields

Your Job Field*
Other Regional Publications - Select below
Your Location*